139. Rethinking Major Gifts Metrics in 2026
About this episode
Most major gift dashboards in 2026 are still measuring activity from 2016.
We track visits, dials, and dollars to goal. We hand the report to leadership, brace for the questions, and hope the numbers held up.
The work itself, the quiet, slow, deeply relational work of moving a donor from interested to committed, doesn't really show up. When your scoreboard misses the work, your scoreboard ends up shaping the wrong work.
This week's episode of The Intentional Fundraiser podcast is all about rethinking the metrics that drive major gift behavior, especially in a year when teams are leaner, AI is in every CRM, and leadership is asking sharper questions about return on investment.
Five lenses for better major gift metrics
Here are the five lenses I keep coming back to with my coaching clients. You don't need all of them tomorrow. You need to know which one your team is missing.
Moves through pipeline stages. Not how many donors you have, but how many you moved from one stage to the next this month. This single metric forces your team to define what "moving forward" means for each donor, and it surfaces the portfolios that look full but aren't producing.
Meaningful contacts, not all touchpoints. A two-way exchange that advanced your knowledge of the donor or their connection to the mission. Email blasts don't count. Twelve meaningful contacts a month will outperform fifty mixed touchpoints, every time.
Pipeline health by stage. A snapshot, not a count. Where are donors stuck? Cultivation past 12 months? Solicitation with no proposal yet? Pipeline health tells you where the bottleneck is, which tells you where to coach.
Donor retention by giving level. Major donors behave differently than mid-level donors, and mid-level behaves differently than annual fund. A single retention number hides your most important story.
Upgrade rates. What percent of mid-level donors moved into the major gift pipeline this year? What percent of major donors moved up a tier? These are the numbers that show whether the overall program is growing.
Add one of these alongside whatever you already track. Watch what changes in the next coaching conversation you have.
Use AI for patterns, not punishments
A quick word on AI in your stack. Most modern donor databases now have AI-assisted insight features. They can flag donors who are slowing down, segments where retention is slipping, or pipeline stages where movement has stalled.
Use them. But not as a verdict.
The role of AI inside major gifts is to surface patterns worth a coaching conversation, not to grade your team faster. If your AI tool starts replacing judgment instead of informing it, you've handed the scoreboard to the wrong coach.
Try this in the next 30 to 60 minutes
You don't have to overhaul your dashboard this week to feel a shift. Try this:
Open your current dashboard. Pick one metric you suspect is shaping behavior in a way you don't love. Most teams I work with point to raw visit count or dollars to goal.
Add one leading indicator next to it. My favorite starter is moves through pipeline stages, because it forces a real conversation about what's moving and what's stuck.
Run your next one-on-one with both numbers visible. Lead with the leading indicator. Ask, "What is this telling you about your portfolio?" and "What do you want to try next?" Notice the energy in the room change.
If you want the full conversation behind these ideas, including the analogy I use with my training clients to explain why dollars raised is the wrong number to coach to, this week's podcast episode walks through it in detail.
Listen to the full episode above.
I'd love to hear from you
Connect with me on LinkedIn and tell me which metric you feel most judged by right now, and which one you'd add if you had the chance. Your answers shape the conversations I have with the next development director who reaches out feeling stuck.
Better metrics don't make fundraising harder. They make it honest, and they make it coachable. That's the shift worth chasing this quarter.
“Major gifts is a long game, and the leading indicators usually move first. Your job is to teach your leadership to read those indicators with you.”
Tammy Zonker, Major Gift Expert, Keynote Speaker, Author
This episode brought to you by
The Intentional Fundraiser podcast has been selected by FeedSpot as one of the Top Fundraising Podcasts on the web.
We’re thrilled to share some exciting news with our community! The Intentional Fundraiser podcast has been selected by FeedSpot as one of the Top Fundraising Podcasts on the web.
This recognition means so much to us, and it wouldn’t be possible without your support, encouragement, and thoughtful engagement. Every listen, share, and conversation has helped us grow and reach more passionate fundraisers like you.
Thank you for being part of our journey! We can’t wait to keep bringing you inspiring stories, practical tips, and meaningful conversations to help you fundraise with intention and impact.
Here’s to making a difference, together!
Rate, review, and follow on Apple Podcasts
“I love Tammy and The Intentional Fundraiser Podcast” 👈 If that sounds like you, please consider rating and reviewing my show! This will enable me to reach more fundraisers — just like you — and help them become better fundraisers, faster. Click here, scroll to the bottom, tap to rate with five stars, and tap “Write a Review.” Then, let me know what you liked most about this particular episode or how you find my podcast helpful, valuable, insightful, or inspiring in some way.
Subscribe to this podcast
Also, if you haven’t done so already, subscribe to this podcast. I’m adding a bunch of bonus episodes to the feed, and if you’re not following, there’s a good chance you’ll miss out. Subscribe now!
Connect with Tammy Zonker on social
You can also connect with Tammy on Twitter and Instagram at @tammyzonker, and on LinkedIn.
We can help you take your fundraising results to the next level
To get started, learn more about joining our exclusive Transformers Community.