157. Growing the Next Wave of Major Gift Talent
How Do You Develop the Next Generation of Major Gift Fundraisers?
You develop major gift fundraisers through everyday coaching rather than formal training. Build four competencies, which are strategic thinking, technology fluency, an equity lens, and resilience, using five practices that cost nothing, then anchor them in a one-page development plan with one growth area, one stretch assignment, and thirty recurring minutes on the calendar. If you manage fundraisers and hiring hasn't solved your turnover problem, this is the shift that will.
This is for development directors, chief development officers, and senior major gift officers who want to grow the people on their team instead of replacing them every eighteen months. By the end, you'll be able to name what the fundraisers coming up now need, coach inside work you're already doing, and build a development plan in about thirty minutes.
Almost thirty years ago, a development director took four minutes out of her day and changed the direction of my career.
I had a donor meeting with a man who intimidated me. She stopped by my desk and asked what I planned to ask him. I recited my agenda. She said, "That's fine. But what do you really want to know about him?"
I said I wanted to know why he kept giving when he clearly didn't need us. She said, "Ask him that."
He talked for twenty minutes about his mother, a scholarship, and a debt he'd been paying back for forty years. He made our largest gift that year.
Four minutes. No budget, no program, no conference. That's what coaching really is.
What's different about the next generation of fundraisers?
Three things changed at once.
The work got harder. Donors ask better questions and expect faster answers. A new officer who once had two years to learn is now expected to be useful in two quarters.
The bench is thinner. Fewer people choose fundraising as a first career. The ones arriving come from education, social work, sales, and communications with real transferable skills and no major gift training.
Their expectations are different. They want to know what they're growing into, they want feedback more often than annually, and they want the reasoning behind decisions rather than just the decisions.
That third one gets framed as entitlement sometimes, and I'd push back on that gently. I wanted to know what I was growing into too. I just didn't feel like I could ask.
Here's the pattern I keep seeing. Fundraisers who leave in year two rarely leave over money. They leave because nobody could tell them what year three looked like.
What competencies should you be building?
Four things show up consistently in the fundraisers who are thriving right now.
Strategic thinking. Knowing why a donor is in the portfolio, what the next right move is, and when to release a name. Most often assumed, least often taught.
Technology fluency. Comfort with the CRM and with AI as a working tool. The people using it well are getting back three or four hours a week and spending them in front of donors.
An equity lens. Recognizing that generosity lives in every community and that traditional prospect research points us back to the same rooms. Newer fundraisers often see this faster than we do.
Resilience. Major gift work has a long feedback loop with a lot of quiet in it. Sitting in that quiet without reading it as failure is a skill, and it can be coached.
What coaching practices work best?
None of these require a budget. All of them fit inside work you're already doing.
Think out loud in front of them. Narrate why you're waiting a month instead of asking now. They can see what you do. They can't see how you decided.
Bring them to the meeting, then debrief in the car. Ask "What did you notice?" before you say what you noticed.
Ask before you answer. When someone brings you a problem, try "What are you thinking?" first. Ninety extra seconds, and it builds a fundraiser instead of a dependent.
Debrief the losses out loud, with no blame in the room. Resilience gets built by watching someone you respect stay steady after a no.
Name what they did well, specifically. Not "great job." Try, "The way you paused after her question instead of filling the silence, that's the whole skill."
What happens if you skip this?
The replacement cost of a major gift officer runs well past a year of salary. That's the number you can see.
The one you can't see is the relationship cost. When a donor has had three officers in four years, they stop investing, and a fifty thousand dollar donor quietly becomes a five thousand dollar donor without anyone flagging it. You also lose institutional memory that never made it into the CRM, and eventually you lose your own ability to hand anything off.
And a caution on the other side. Making space for new voices means real space. A newer fundraiser needs to be the primary relationship manager for a real donor, not a practice donor. Development that never includes actual risk isn't development. It's supervised observation.
Try this in the next 30 to 60 minutes
Pick one person. Write down the name of the one person you'll intentionally develop before the end of the year.
Build the one-page plan with them. One growth area for ninety days, one stretch assignment, who they'll learn from, one observable signal it worked, and thirty recurring minutes on the calendar that is not the pipeline meeting.
Book one shared donor meeting. Then protect fifteen minutes afterward to debrief it.
I'd love to hear from you
Connect with me on LinkedIn and tell me who invested in you early in your fundraising career, and what they did. These stories are some of my favorites, and I've never heard one that was about a training budget.
Ten years from now, nobody on your team will tell a story about a competency matrix. They'll tell a story about four minutes at their desk. You get to be that four minutes for somebody.
Frequently Asked Questions
Q1. Who is this approach best suited for?
This is designed for development directors, chief development officers, and senior major gift officers who want to grow their fundraisers rather than rehire them. It works especially well if you already have at least one newer or mid-level fundraiser on staff and regular contact with them.
Q2. How much time should I expect this to take each week?
About one hour a week per person you're developing. Thirty minutes of dedicated conversation, and the rest folded into meetings and debriefs already on your calendar. Consistency matters more than volume, so protect that thirty minutes the way you'd protect a donor visit.
Q3. What if my organization is small and I wear multiple hats?
Scale the tactics, keep the principles. Pick one person and one growth area for ninety days instead of a full team plan. If you're a shop of one, trade monthly coaching conversations with a peer at another organization. That counts.
Q4. How do I know if it's working?
Watch for a newer fundraiser bringing you a recommendation instead of a question, better CRM notes without being asked, and someone volunteering for a conversation they'd have avoided in the spring. Over time you should see longer tenure, faster ramp for new hires, and portfolios that keep their momentum through a transition.
Q5. Where does AI fit into this, if at all?
AI clears space for the human work. Use an approved assistant to turn call notes into summaries and next steps, to run donor role-play so a newer fundraiser can practice a solicitation five times before doing it once for real, and to draft a first version of a development plan you edit together. The encouragement, the honest feedback, and the read on readiness stay with you.
“We have a talent problem that we keep trying to solve with hiring, and hiring is not the solution to a development problem.”
Tammy Zonker, Major Gift Expert, Keynote Speaker, Author
This episode brought to you by
The Intentional Fundraiser podcast has been selected by FeedSpot as one of the Top Fundraising Podcasts on the web.
We’re thrilled to share some exciting news with our community! The Intentional Fundraiser podcast has been selected by FeedSpot as one of the Top Fundraising Podcasts on the web.
This recognition means so much to us, and it wouldn’t be possible without your support, encouragement, and thoughtful engagement. Every listen, share, and conversation has helped us grow and reach more passionate fundraisers like you.
Thank you for being part of our journey! We can’t wait to keep bringing you inspiring stories, practical tips, and meaningful conversations to help you fundraise with intention and impact.
Here’s to making a difference, together!
Rate, review, and follow on Apple Podcasts
“I love Tammy and The Intentional Fundraiser Podcast” 👈 If that sounds like you, please consider rating and reviewing my show! This will enable me to reach more fundraisers — just like you — and help them become better fundraisers, faster. Click here, scroll to the bottom, tap to rate with five stars, and tap “Write a Review.” Then, let me know what you liked most about this particular episode or how you find my podcast helpful, valuable, insightful, or inspiring in some way.
Subscribe to this podcast
Also, if you haven’t done so already, subscribe to this podcast. I’m adding a bunch of bonus episodes to the feed, and if you’re not following, there’s a good chance you’ll miss out. Subscribe now!
Connect with Tammy Zonker on social
You can also connect with Tammy on Twitter and Instagram at @tammyzonker, and on LinkedIn.
We can help you take your fundraising results to the next level
To get started, learn more about joining our exclusive Transformers Community.